Michael Railling
Biology 3920
RFA Research Proposal
Comparison of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates in Pool and
Riffle Habitats of
Michael Railling
Department of Biology
Undergraduate Student
Table of Contents
Standard Form
Key Contacts
Abstract
Research Plan
Resume
Current and Pending Support
Budget
Budget Justification
Quality Assurance
Abstract
Aquatic communities were
quantitatively taken with artificial substrate samplers in pool and riffle
habitats of the
Research Plan
The Blackburn Fork is a productive 4th order stream in Jackson and Putnam counties(Baker 1994). Macro invertebrates are good indicators of Stream Quality because They are closely associated with the conditions of the environment, They are easy to collect, they are relatively stationary, and they have a wide distribution(Plotnikoff and Ethinger 1997, Newell et al. 2002). Macroinvertebrate assemblages not only vary regionally they can also vary greatly at local levels(Heino et al. 2003). Abundance of the macroinvertebrates can be affected by many factors but habitat is the prima factor(Waters and Giovanni 2003). Organisms have adaptations to certain substrates especially invertebrates. Some may prefer the larger cobble and faster currents of a riffle and other may prefer the slower and bedrock substrate found in a pool(Cushing and Allan 2001). Pools generally have higher dissolved oxygen levels and a more neutral pH.
Water Qualities In pH and dissolved oxygen can have a significant effect on the biota(Boto and Bunt 1981). Are the macroinvertebrate in pool and riffle composed of the same taxa or densities? In my research I plan to show that pool and riffle habitats have comparably different taxa and proportions of these taxa.
Six
different sites were selected in the
Four of the samples were scrubbed, the two remaining riffle samples and two randomly selected from the pools. Invertebrates were separated from the substrate and identified to Genus. Chironoidae were left at family because they are difficult to identify(Wymer and Cook 2003). Data was recorded using the following data form(table1).
Table 1. Data From Used in Analysis
Data Form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observer: |
Michael Railling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pool |
|
|
|
|
Riffle |
|
|
|
Genus |
|
Score |
|
|
Genus |
|
Score |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Taxa |
|
Score Taxa |
|
|
Total Taxa |
|
Score Taxa |
|
Total EPT's |
|
Score EPT's |
|
|
Total EPT's |
|
Score EPT's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxa Richness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% EPT's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resume
Michael A. Railling
MARailling21@tntech.edu
931-252-4339
OBJECTIVE: Seeking a
challenging position which will utilize my interests and talents in the areas
of fisheries and environmental biology.
QUALIFICATIONS:
Dedicated individual possessing both lab and field experience in the environmental biology.
EDUCATION
1991-1995
1998-2003 Bachelor of Science, Wildlife/Fisheries Science Concentration: Fisheries
Minor: Biology
RELATED COURSE WORK
Fish Management, Limnology, Biostatistics, Ecology, Botany, Genetics, Invertebrate Zoology, Aquaculture, Systematic Botany, Ichthyology, Phycology, and National Wildlife Policy
ORGANIZATIONS
Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity
Structured Athletics for Challenged Children Volunteer
Special Olympics Volunteer
WORK EXPERIENCE
2003 Lab Technician, Pennington & Associates Inc., Responsibilities include
separating invertebrates from stream samples; constructing substrates used to
collect invertebrate animals and algae; invertebrate collection using D-frame kick
nets, kick screens, and Hester-Dendy artificial substrates; experience in fisheries
including, electrofishing and fish identification.
Budget
Research Budget |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and Wages |
Year 1 |
|
Year 2 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional |
|
$
150.00 |
|
$ 150.00 |
|
Technician |
|
$
65.00 |
|
$
65.00 |
|
Secretarial |
|
$
90.00 |
|
$
90.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
$
305.00 |
|
$ 305.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
$
- |
|
$
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel |
|
|
$
25.00 |
|
$
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Expendables |
|
$
100.00 |
|
$ 100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expendables |
|
|
|
|
|
Computer |
|
|
$
700.00 |
|
$
- |
Supplies and Expenses |
$
278.13 |
|
$ 6.94
|
||
Copying and Telephone |
$
20.00 |
|
$
20.00 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
$
998.13 |
|
$
26.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect Costs |
|
$
125.00 |
|
$ 125.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Costs |
|
$1,303.13 |
|
$ 331.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost |
|
$1,428.13 |
|
$ 456.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Research Cost |
$1,885.07 |
|
|